Adult Content Removal
Tap a star to rate
What it is
Adult Content Removal is a takedown service for adult creators and entertainers whose paid content has been copied and reposted without permission. It does not pay anyone. A creator pays it to find the copies, send removal notices and clear the search results that point to them. The site states that its team has been removing content from the internet since 2016, and that it is "one of the only companies offering removal services located in the United States". The pages do not publish a price, so the cost of joining is only known after a consultation.
Its client base, in its own words, is "Adult Stars and entertainers that rely on income from their fans and subscribers". The pages are written in English and the main examples are OnlyFans leaks, though the service also lists revenge content and explicit search results.
How earning works here
For an earner, this is a protection route rather than an earning route. The money it is meant to defend is the income from subscriptions, pay-per-view messages and tips, which falls when paid material turns up for free elsewhere. The site frames its job as helping creators "lock down all of your leaked content" and "remove all pirated material from the internet and Google".
The service describes a five-step process on its OnlyFans leak page.
- Identification. The team begins by finding where the content has been posted, which the page says includes scanning piracy sites, forums and file hosting platforms.
- Evidence documentation. Each instance of a leak is recorded with screenshots and URLs, and the page says this documentation is necessary for submitting removal requests.
- DMCA takedown requests. Formal copyright takedown notices go to the websites hosting the material.
- Hosting provider notifications. If a website does not respond, the team contacts the hosting provider responsible for the servers and asks for removal.
- Search engine removal. Requests are filed so that indexed pages and cached versions stop appearing in search results.
Beyond those steps, the pages describe monitoring. The FAQ says that when content keeps reappearing, monitoring detects new reposts so additional takedown requests can be issued quickly, and one of the case summaries describes mirror domains where "continuous monitoring helped detect reposts and remove them quickly". The same page admits that some websites may repost leaked material, so a removal is not presented as permanent.
The site lists the kinds of work it takes on. Its home page names removal of OnlyFans leaks and leaked OnlyFans content, removal of revenge content, removal of explicit search results, and stopping piracy distribution. The OnlyFans page adds stolen content on adult aggregator sites and removal of leaked content from Google search results. The about page also mentions private adult content more broadly and "clean up your Google Search Results".
Two short case summaries show how the site describes outcomes. In one, a creator found several subscription videos on piracy websites, the investigation identified more than 30 URLs hosting the content, and after copyright takedown requests and hosting provider contact "most of the links were removed within weeks". In another, search results kept showing stolen content even after some sites removed the videos, so search engine removal requests were filed to clear indexed pages and cached results, and the listings were cleared. The testimonials are unsigned, so they are the site's own presentation.
The team behind this is described as on-site corporate attorneys and technical staff. The about page says the attorneys supply the legal backing to enforce a creator's rights, while the technical people identify, track and remove content. It says the site is run from the United States and that its familiarity with local law is an advantage. The site also says that OnlyFans creators keep ownership of their original content and that piracy platforms target OnlyFans material because it draws high search traffic. That is the site's explanation of why leaks are common.
Its blog titles point at the same subjects, including an OnlyFans piracy protection guide, removing OnlyFans leaks from Google, and DMCA for OnlyFans content.
Money and rules
The site sells by consultation rather than by price list. Its pages route visitors to a "Book An Appointment" button and a contact page and advertise a "Confidential Consultation," and they publish no prices, plans or fees, so the cost is set case by case.
Timing is stated as a range. The FAQ says the timeframe depends on how many websites host the content, and that "Some removals occur within a few days while others may take several weeks." The page does not promise a date.
On results, the site makes a conditional claim rather than a guarantee: "When content is protected by copyright, many hosting providers comply with valid takedown requests." On the leak page the same answer reads "Copyright takedown procedures allow creators to request removal of unauthorized content from websites and hosting providers." It says search engine removal requests "can eliminate indexed pages and cached results from search listings," and it admits that "some websites may repost leaked material," which is what the monitoring is for. The about page goes further in its own voice, promising to get content "removed permanently from all corners of the internet"; that is the company's marketing line, set against its FAQ's more careful wording.
The documentation step matters for a creator's own preparation. The home page says each violation is documented with URLs, screenshots and ownership verification, so a client should expect to show that the content is theirs. Copyright is the lever the whole process uses, which is why the site stresses that creators keep full ownership rights over their original content.
On privacy, the site states that "Client privacy is protected throughout the removal process," that every case is handled privately "with strict protection of client identity," and that its specialists handle each case "with complete discretion." One leak-page testimonial says the team "kept my information private."
Who it suits and who it does not
The service suits a creator who has already found leaks and wants a team to handle the identification, documentation and filing rather than doing it by hand. The leak page says "Many creators attempt to report these leaks themselves but quickly realize how complex and time-consuming the process can be," and that is the gap it sells into. An established creator whose subscription income depends on exclusivity matches the problems it lists, and so does anyone dealing with revenge content, private photos shared without consent, or search results tied to their name. The blog also covers deepfake abuse under the Take It Down Act, so a performer targeted by AI-generated fakes will find the topic addressed.
It also fits someone who wants a US-based provider with attorneys on staff, since those are the points the about page stresses, along with "Over eight years of successful content removals."
There are limits. With no price list, plan tiers or self-service signup, a creator who wants to compare costs or start immediately meets an appointment step first. Some removals take several weeks by the site's own account, and reposts can happen, so it fits a creator ready for ongoing work rather than a one-off cleanup.