Erase.com
Tap a star to rate
What Erase.com is
Erase.com is a reputation management and content removal company. It does not pay earners; a creator pays it to take leaked or unwanted material down and to manage what shows up in search results. Its footer describes it as a global reputation management company helping individuals, professionals and businesses, and the OnlyFans content removal page is the part written for creators. The site states it has served 10,000+ clients since 2009, which is the company's own figure, and the footer names the operator as Erase Technologies, LLC.
On the OnlyFans page the company says it "can remove any kind of OnlyFans content from the internet including copyrighted, edited or pirated videos". It also says it will make sure the videos are removed from Google search results, Images and Videos. There is no price list: the page says pricing is customized to the complexity and scope of each project, starts with a free consultation, and runs on a pay-for-results model under the banner "No Money Upfront". The footer lists offices in Miami, Florida and Burlington, Ontario, and the site is written in English for a general audience rather than for adult creators alone.
How the service works
The OnlyFans page frames the work as two jobs. One is deleting leaked videos and images at the source. The other is getting them out of search. The page says Erase.com works to ensure "negative content is completely removed from both the source and your search results", and that it can delete OnlyFans videos and images from Google and, "in many circumstances, directly from the source". It names Reddit, Snapchat, Twitter/X and Instagram among the places it removes leaked videos from, and says it removes OnlyFans content from social media, forums, message boards, porn sites and accounts. For Reddit, the page says its specialized team and attorneys it works with handle the removal. The page presents OnlyFans removal as "one of our specialties" that has set the company apart for more than 15 years.
The page also covers a second kind of client: someone with old OnlyFans content from an account they no longer want to be associated with, or a creator who wants the content to stay behind the paywall. Both are treated as removal work, and the page says its service is meant to permanently remove such videos rather than only suppress them.
Behind the creator page sits the same four-step process the home page describes for every engagement.
- Audit. The team maps everything appearing in search, identifies which results are harmful and which are helpful, and what actions can be taken.
- Remove. It files formal takedown requests against policy-violating content, working directly with platforms rather than relying on automated flags.
- Suppress. It builds and strengthens positive content such as profiles, articles and authority assets to push harmful results down and replace them.
- Monitor. It tracks search results, new mentions and review activity on an ongoing basis.
The FAQ explains why the company treats this as more than a takedown. It describes reputation management as a proactive process of building, protecting and improving a digital identity, and says the search results page is handled as an ecosystem. The approach starts with a strategic search audit and a roadmap that balances immediate removals with long-term visibility control, beginning with the results that have the biggest effect on a first impression. If a site owner blocks a direct removal, the FAQ says the company shifts to suppression, building high-authority assets that push the harmful result lower in the rankings. The FAQ also says the company helps people who do not have anything bad online yet, which it calls proactive or defensive management.
For a creator, the practical meaning is that a leak is handled on two fronts. A removed page can still show in search for a while, and a creator whose name pulls up leak sites on page one can lose first impressions with new fans. Suppression is the company's answer to that second problem, and it is a different service from deleting the file.
Discretion is part of the pitch. Asked whether the person who posted the content will know about the removal, the FAQ says the company prefers a low-drama, professional approach to avoid drawing more attention to the problem, and communicates with platforms through technical and policy-based frameworks to resolve the issue quietly.
The home and about pages list three service lines. Reputation management covers how a brand or name appears in Google over time. Review removal covers policy-violating reviews on Google, Trustpilot, Glassdoor, Indeed and 15+ other platforms. Content removal covers harmful material such as news articles, mugshots, court records and personal information, from search results and source sites. The review and news lines are not creator-specific, but a creator with a business name, a studio or an agency may find them useful.
Communication goes through the case itself. The OnlyFans page promises "keeping you updated throughout the process", and the company's SMS terms describe text updates on a case, with an opt-in on the web form and the carrier's message and data rates possibly applying.
Money, timing and guarantees
Nothing is paid to the creator; the creator is the client. What a creator pays is quoted case by case. The FAQ says no ethical company can guarantee a removal, because platforms have the final say, and that its removals run on a pay-for-results model: the client pays only once the content is taken down or de-indexed. If removal is not possible, the company says it moves to a suppression strategy. A free assessment comes first; the FAQ says it involves no commitment, results are reviewed within 24 hours, and a clear action plan is included.
On timing, the OnlyFans page says removal "can vary depending on the type of content, when it was uploaded, and how much content needs to be removed", and that the process "can take anywhere from a few days to several weeks".
The strongest commitment is the lifetime guarantee in the FAQ. If a removed item ever resurfaces, Erase.com says it will remove it again at no extra cost or issue a full refund for that specific item. The company says it also uses active monitoring so copycat sites do not republish the same data. The website terms say orders and purchases are final, and that the terms are governed by the laws of the State of Florida.
The about page lists results the company claims: 100,000+ reviews and URLs removed across 2,000+ platforms, nearly all clients suppressed within 6 months, and more than half cleared within 3 months. These are the company's own statistics, and "suppressed" refers to pushing harmful results down in search. They are not a statement about how many leaked videos get deleted at the source. The about page also lists a team of 65+ members, a BBB A+ rating, an active Clutch profile, and citations in Forbes, CNN, Inc., Entrepreneur and Fast Company.
Who it suits
Erase.com fits an established creator who wants search results managed as well as leaks deleted: someone whose name is searched often, and who is willing to treat visibility as ongoing work and not a single cleanup. The audit, remove, suppress and monitor sequence assumes a longer engagement, and the lifetime guarantee matters most for content that keeps returning. It also fits a former creator who wants an old account's videos gone, a case the OnlyFans page addresses directly.
A creator who wants attorneys involved in difficult removals has a reason to look here, since the OnlyFans page says the company works with attorneys on Reddit removals. A creator with a business, studio or agency name to protect can use the same company for review removal.
There are caveats. With no published price, a creator on a tight budget has to go through the free consultation to learn the cost. The company's headline numbers describe its whole client base across many industries and not adult creators, so they say little about how fast an OnlyFans leak comes down; the page itself gives a range of a few days to several weeks. And a creator who only wants a low-cost automated monitor for repeated re-uploads may find a full reputation program larger than the problem.