EraseMe

Tap a star to rate

What EraseMe is

EraseMe is a UK online privacy and content removal service, run by EraseMe Ltd from Brentwood, United Kingdom. It does not pay creators. Creators and former OnlyFans models pay it to help remove photos and videos that were copied, leaked, reposted or indexed without permission. Its stolen-content page says the company helps creators target "stolen OnlyFans content, leaked videos, reposted images, impersonation profiles and unauthorised uploads", and that it also helps creators on other subscription and adult content platforms.

The wider business is a privacy service for individuals, creators, professionals and businesses. Its services page lists personal data removal, Google search result removal, facial recognition scans, revenge porn and private content removal, creator copyright support, executive privacy protection, corporate privacy support and data broker removal. The home page publishes 3 monthly packages, set out below, and a custom tier for businesses. The stolen-content page closes by describing the service as fully confidential, without obligation and UK based, and the contact details on the terms page say the company is open 7 days a week.

How removal works

The company describes a case as a structured process, not an automated feed. The stolen-content page says it works to identify where content has been copied and shared, then acts through takedown requests, copyright claims and search engine de-indexing to reduce visibility. It is candid that not every website cooperates right away, and that a structured approach "significantly improves the chances" of removing stolen content and limiting its spread.

There are two routes, and the services page says it looks at both where possible. The first is the source: contacting the website, platform, host, registrar or data broker directly. The second is search: submitting de-indexing requests to Google, Bing and other search engines, which can reduce visibility even when the original site will not remove the content. Where a result cannot be removed completely, the home page says the company may look at de-indexing, outdated cache updates, source removal or suppression options.

For creators, the services page names the tools it may use depending on the case: copyright routes, platform reports, website takedown requests, search engine de-indexing and image discovery methods. It says these can support creators, models and ex-creators whose photos or videos have been copied.

Discovery runs through what the company calls EraseMe Intelligence, described as its facial recognition and online exposure analysis process. The page says it helps identify where a face appears online, including image matches that may not show in a normal name search, and that the scan can support image discovery, exposure reporting and next-step removal recommendations. On the stolen-content page it is also pitched as a way to find content a creator has not seen yet, including platforms the creator may not know about, so that hidden or newly indexed copies can be acted on early.

Intake is specific. The stolen-content page says the company usually needs the links the creator has found, any usernames or aliases connected to the content, 2 to 3 clear pictures to run EraseMe Intelligence, and consent to act on the creator's behalf. Monitoring comes up in the services page, which says private-image cases can include ongoing monitoring for reappearances.

The same company handles related cases. It says it can locate, report, de-index and pursue removal of private images or videos shared without consent, using facial recognition checks, reverse image discovery, platform reports, search engine removal requests and monitoring. It also says it can reduce exposed personal information on data brokers, people-search websites and public directories, which may include names, addresses, phone numbers and emails. For a creator who worries about a real name or address being tied to a stage name, that data broker work is a separate service from takedowns.

A case starts with a form. The home page asks for any links or details that help explain the situation, and the team reviews the enquiry from there.

Money, timing and rules

Nothing is paid out to creators; the creator is the paying client, on a monthly package with a fixed term. The terms set the payment rules. Payment is required in full and in advance before any work begins, fees vary with the complexity of the request or the package chosen, subscription clients pay by monthly Direct Debit, and all payments are non-refundable once the service has started. The terms also cap the company's liability at the fees paid for the relevant service.

The home page sets out 3 packages and a custom tier, which differ by how many removal requests they include and whether discovery and monitoring are part of the work. As of October 2026 the listed prices run from £13.99 a month for Basic to £86.99 a month for Premium:

  • Basic Package (targeted data deletion): billed monthly for 6 to 12 months, with up to 3 data removal requests, written confirmation of actions and a final PDF report.
  • Advanced Package (facial recognition and discovery), marked most popular and priced between the other two: billed monthly for 12 months, adding facial recognition scans, up to 9 removal requests a year, a detailed scan report and escalation to data protection authorities.
  • Premium Package (reputation management): billed monthly for 12 months, with unlimited removal requests, a full digital footprint investigation, ongoing monitoring and alerts, and priority case handling.
  • Organisation / Custom: custom pricing for businesses and teams.

Timing is described in ranges, not figures. The stolen-content page says some websites respond within days while others take several weeks, and that search engine de-indexing can take time to update fully. The home page adds that GDPR, search engine and source-level requests may take several weeks, and that the company keeps clients updated and explains what has been submitted.

On guarantees, the home page says "No responsible removal company can guarantee every result will be removed", because final decisions sit with websites, platforms, search engines or data controllers. What it says it does guarantee is a "structured, GDPR-led process, careful case review, clear communication and persistent follow-up where a valid route exists".

On privacy, the company states cases are handled confidentially and that it does not store or publish a client's content. Its GDPR policy says personal data is irreversibly deleted unless a longer retention period is legally required. It will respond to data requests within the statutory period of 1 month, extendable by 2 additional months in complex cases. The policy says the services are not directed at anyone under 18.

The terms are governed by the laws of England and Wales, with the courts of England and Wales holding exclusive jurisdiction. The company states it is registered with the ICO, registration number ZC134341.

Who it suits

EraseMe fits a creator or former creator, especially one in the UK, who wants people to run the case and handle search de-indexing along with takedowns. The facial recognition discovery step fits someone who does not know where copies have ended up. The company says it can work on leaks beyond OnlyFans, so a creator who sold on several adult platforms does not need a different service for each.

It also fits creators who care about the legal frame. The company positions its work around GDPR and UK law, which is useful context for UK and EU creators.

The caveats are real. The packages run for 6 to 12 months or a full 12 months, paid up front and non-refundable once work starts, which is a firm commitment for a creator with a single leak. Facial recognition requires the creator to hand over 2 to 3 clear pictures, which some creators may not want to do for privacy reasons, even though the company says content is not stored or published. And the company says outright that removal is never guaranteed, so a creator whose leaks sit on sites that ignore notices should expect reduced visibility rather than complete deletion.

More in Leak takedown and DMCA

See all