Minc Law

What Minc Law is

Minc Law is a US law firm with its office in Cleveland, Ohio, that handles internet defamation, online content removal and DMCA takedowns, with a dedicated service page for leaked adult content. It does not pay creators. It charges clients, and its pages quote fees by type of work. A creator contacts the firm by phone or form, gets a free case evaluation, and signs an engagement letter before work starts. The firm describes itself on its FAQ page as the nation's leading internet defamation law firm. That is the firm's own claim about itself, and the site is written in English.

The DMCA service page promises to handle the whole process: "We'll handle the process from start to finish, allowing you to get back to doing what you love." For a creator, that means a lawyer files the notices rather than the creator doing it alone.

What the firm does for a creator

The firm runs a service page for DMCA takedown lawyer services and two near-identical guide pages on leaked adult content and unauthorized porn content. Those guides lay out how a notice moves.

According to the guide, most hosts accept DMCA notices by email or through their own submission form. The notice text is pasted in and can be attached as a PDF or image files. The same process applies to search engines such as Google and Bing, each of which has its own DMCA form. The guide says international sites with no US presence "can be trickier," and that working with their upstream providers or using foreign DMCA equivalents may help.

On timing, the guide says that after a valid DMCA notice, most sites remove content within 24-72 hours, and search engines typically de-index infringing URLs within a few days.

The guide also covers a question creators often ask. It says you do not need to register your copyrights to file DMCA takedown notices, because as soon as you create a work you own the rights. It then says registration strengthens a later copyright lawsuit and makes you eligible for statutory damages, and it advises considering registering key content. That is the firm's guidance on its own page, written for creators in general and not for any one case.

Beyond DMCA, the firm's menus list a wider practice that includes revenge porn removal, blackmail and sextortion, online harassment, fake account and impersonation removal, online investigation and digital reputation monitoring. Its getting-started page names intimate or unauthorized images and videos, leaked personal information and impersonation profiles among the content it removes, and says it represents clients across all 50 states and internationally, working with local counsel when needed. Where the person behind a post is anonymous, it says it uses court-authorized discovery, subpoenas and digital forensics to identify them. Its testimonials include clients in sextortion cases.

How a case starts

The getting-started page sets out 4 steps: a free case review with the intake team, which says it will point people to other resources if it is not the right fit; a paid consultation with an attorney that produces a legal strategy and next steps; work on the case once the client hires the firm; and removal of the content, with a claim for financial compensation where appropriate.

The DMCA service page describes intake. You reach the firm by phone, message or the contact form. The page introduces its intake and paralegal manager, who explains what happens after you submit. If you decide to move forward, the firm drafts an engagement letter for your review and signature and then begins working on your case. The page says: "All in all, this process takes between 1-3 business days." The phone number given is (216) 373-7706, and the page offers a free case evaluation.

The services page also shows testimonial videos, among them from clients in sextortion cases.

Money and rules

Minc Law is engaged case by case, not by subscription. The getting-started page says every engagement is customized to the client's needs and goals, that legal costs vary by case complexity, and that an exact estimate needs a conversation with the team. The defamation FAQ says the firm bills on an hourly basis or requires a retainer, and that "no win, no fee" arrangements are rare in this kind of work. The first case review with the intake team is free, the consultation with an attorney that follows is paid, and nothing starts until the engagement letter is signed.

The getting-started page publishes broad price bands, with separate ones for matters handled without a lawsuit, for litigation and for sextortion work. In October 2026 it lists non-lawsuit matters at $5,000 to $10,000 and sextortion services at a $3,500 minimum, with litigation cases priced well above both. The defamation FAQ, which is written about defamation work and not about DMCA notices, adds hourly rates, retainers and monthly costs for contested lawsuits, and says initial consultations start at $500 for a one-hour session with an attorney.

That FAQ also describes guaranteed content removal services, which address specific pieces of defamatory content through platform negotiation and are priced per piece, at $1,500 to $3,000 as of October 2026. The pages give no separate fee for a plain DMCA notice. As a law firm it also points to its duty of confidentiality, which its About page contrasts with reputation companies that can be subpoenaed for a client's private information.

The firm's track record, as the firm gives it

Two pages give different counts. The services page says "We have litigated over 350 cases in 26 states and 5 countries" and that it has removed 200,000+ pieces of defamatory and damaging online content. The FAQ page says the firm, founded by Aaron Minc, has handled over 3,000 successful cases, litigated in 35 states and 6 countries, and removed over 200,000 pieces of content. The two pages do not agree, so these read as the firm's marketing claims. The About page also calls it the nation's #1 internet defamation law firm. The careers page states a mission to protect and improve 15,000 reputations by 2035.

Who it suits

Minc Law suits a creator whose leaked content has spread beyond what a self-filed DMCA notice can fix, who wants a lawyer to file and follow up, and who can budget for legal fees. It also suits someone dealing with sextortion or a damaging post, where a law firm's reach is the point rather than a monitoring subscription. The free case evaluation lets a creator learn the options before spending anything.

It suits less well a creator who wants ongoing automated monitoring, a flat monthly price or an instant takedown. The pages describe a firm engaged case by case, with an engagement letter and fees that scale with the work. A creator with a handful of copies on cooperative hosts may find the firm's own guide enough to file the notices personally, since it explains the host and search engine routes in detail. The attorney consultation is paid, and even the lowest published band, for matters that stay out of court, is a legal fee and not a subscription price.