E-Moderators
Tap a star to rate
What E-Moderators is
E-Moderators is a chat moderation company that hires home-based moderators to reply to messages on adult social networking sites. It pays per processed message, pays weekly, charges nothing for training and ties no one to a contract. Its language menu offers English and Czech, Danish, Dutch, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Italian, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese, Spanish and Swedish.
The About page calls the company "an international consolidated company" and "the world leader in content moderators for online websites". It states that E-Moderators "are proud to say that they have one of the highest hiring rates in the adult social networking industry". Those are the company's own claims. The same page closes by calling it "the number 1 company on the market". The footer gives the corporate address as Centanni Inc, Trust Company Complex, Ajeltake Road, Ajeltake Island, Majuro, Marshall Islands.
How earning works
The job is simple to state. The home page says "your job will be replying to messages". The moderator logs in to the company's own site, which "allows you to log in without any downloads", and answers customer messages. The company supplies the platform and the work. There is no profile to build, no audience to bring and nothing to sell directly, so this is an employment route and not a creator route.
The home page frames the pay as "progressive": "The more messages you write, the more money you will earn." It then states the range. In October 2026 the English page says the company will pay "from 10 euro cents and up to 24 euro cents per processed message". The Dutch page of the same site gives a different range, "vanaf 13 tot 23 cent per verwerkt bericht" (from 13 to 23 cents per processed message). Both pages state the same weekly average, "€ 350 per week" in the English wording. The company adds that someone who is "open-minded, have a good imagination, like to work and are a fast typer" can earn "a lot more". These are the company's claims about its own moderators, not a figure to plan around. The Dutch page spells out what "progressive" means: the more messages a moderator writes, the more they earn per message.
What the moderator gets to work with:
- A "personal tutor" in English, a "persoonlijke coach" in Dutch, reachable by Skype or e-mail for questions.
- A web-based system that needs no download.
- Free training: "Our training doesn't cost a thing."
- Choice of hours: "You can choose your working hours", with work "from wherever you want, either at home or on a Caribbean beach".
- No fixed contract. The About page says "you will not be tied down to a contract" and offers "the flexibility of choosing your own hours".
The About page says the company has "a solid base of employees" but that "due to our constant growth, we are always searching for new home-based workers". It describes its aim as giving "freelance workers" "consistent incomes" and says its support team is "devoted to providing excellent training". The company also says it is "always looking for new people for various projects", and the same text mentions career opportunities.
The application page describes the role plainly: a moderator engages "in text-based chats on adult social networks", entertains the user with stimulating conversation and encourages "a long-lasting relationship", building rapport so the customer has a positive experience on the site. The form asks for name, e-mail, age, nationality, country of residence, a Microsoft Teams contact, availability by CET time (day, night or both) and a work experience note of at least 60 characters. The English form then asks which country the applicant wants to apply for, with Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada and Singapore as the choices.
After that comes the real screening: a test of 6 questions, which the page calls "your interview for the position". It warns that "If you do not complete the test, your application will not arrive." Its tips are to avoid very short answers, to avoid giving out contact details such as WhatsApp, Facebook or Instagram, and to watch spelling, and it reminds applicants that "This is an adult contact site and the conversations are very dynamic and diverse." The Dutch page names one requirement for the Dutch-language work: "een goede beheersing van de Nederlandse taal" (a good command of Dutch).
Money and rules
The model is piecework: a rate per processed message that rises with volume, paid weekly against an invoice into the moderator's bank account, with no contract and no charge for training.
Schedule: weekly. "Weekly payment bill. You are able to declare this income to the tax authorities if found necessary." The Dutch page puts it as "Wekelijkse betaling met factuur" (weekly payment with an invoice) and adds that the income can be reported to the tax authority if needed.
Method: the English page says "We work with most payment methods". It names none. The Dutch page asks for "enkel internetverbinding en een geldige bankrekening" (only an internet connection and a valid bank account) into which the money is paid weekly.
Equipment: "WiFi, a laptop and a bank account".
Fees: training is free, as above.
Payment promise: the About page says the company makes "all your payments on time and for the correct amount" and runs "a serious, well structured and trustworthy accounts department".
Per-message rate: a range in euro cents, quoted above, which is not the same on the English and the Dutch page.
Average: one weekly figure, stated as the company's average earnings.
Application: an age field on the form and a 6-question writing test that decides whether the application arrives at all.
The site also carries moderator testimonials. They praise the weekly payments, the freedom to log in whenever wanted and the coach, which is the company showing its own staff feedback and not an outside review. The site does not publish a payout threshold.
Who it suits
The job fits someone who wants paid typing work on a flexible schedule in one of the listed languages and has no wish to appear on camera or build a following. The free training, the coach and the no-contract wording lower the cost of trying it. Weekly payment suits someone who wants income soon after working rather than at month end. People with a laptop, WiFi and a bank account have the practical requirements the pages name, and the form's day, night or both availability choice suits someone who works odd hours.
The caveats are real. The pay range differs between language pages, so an applicant in one market should check the figure for that market. The weekly average is the company's claim and no basis for an income plan, and the work is paid per message, so earnings track typing volume. The English page says it works with most payment methods but names only a bank account. There is no audience-building route, so established creators who want to use their own followers will find nothing here. And the test is the interview: an applicant who writes short or careless answers will not get past it.